U

University Health Network

University Health Network implements digital pathology across 3 primary sites and 29 satellite locations in Ontario

Curated & reviewed by Peter Korpak, Founder & Chief Analyst, 100SignalsHow we verify
89.4%AI Sensitivity for Breast Cancer Metastasis Detection
74.5%Traditional Pathologist Sensitivity (Baseline)
~1 million slides/yearAnnual Slide Volume at UHN

Vendor-reported figures — source: onlinelibrary.wiley.com

The Challenge

UHN's Laboratory Medicine Program operated across three primary diagnostic pathology sites (Toronto General Hospital, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto Western Hospital) and 29 satellite locations in Ontario, processing nearly 1 million slides per year with a team of 70 pathologists. Traditional microscopy was time-consuming, labor-intensive, and subjective, and physical slide transportation across the distributed network created risks of specimen loss and limited cross-site collaboration.

The Solution

UHN implemented digital pathology using high-throughput scanners (300–450 slide capacity) at main facilities and smaller scanners at satellite sites, backed by local server storage and integrated with existing LIS and HIS systems. A modified UK College of Pathologists validation protocol was adopted for regulatory compliance, and each pathologist was equipped with dual 4K monitors. The program was architected to support remote sign-out, teleconference consultations, workload redistribution across sites, and future AI-assisted diagnostics.

Results

The system enabled pathologists to work remotely and share cases across all 29+ locations, reducing dependence on physical slide transport and enabling cross-site workload redistribution. Faster retrieval of archived slides and real-time expert consultations became feasible. The article cites published evidence that AI integration in digital pathology can improve breast cancer metastasis detection sensitivity to 89.4% compared to 74.5% for unassisted pathologists, though UHN-specific outcome metrics were not yet reported at the time of publication.

Key Takeaways

  • A hybrid scanner approach (high-capacity units at main sites, low-capacity units at satellites) balances throughput needs with budget constraints across distributed laboratory networks.
  • Local server storage was preferred over cloud for data sovereignty and long-term cost control, but storage costs grow linearly each year and must be budgeted prospectively.
  • Change management, staff training, and upstream improvements to staining and glass slide quality are as critical to success as scanner selection — poor upstream quality directly increases rescan rates.

Share:

Details

Company Size
Enterprise
Quality
Curated
Last verified
Jul 28, 2026

Have a similar implementation?

Share your customer's AI results and link it to your vendor profile.

Submit a case study →