C

Cleveland Clinic automates mid-revenue cycle coding with AKASA AI, achieving 80-90% automation rate

“Cleveland Clinic automates mid-revenue cycle coding with AKASA AI, achieving 80-90% automation rate” documents a Medical Coding & Revenue Cycle deployment in Hospital & Health System at Cleveland Clinic. health.usnews.com reports coding automation rate: 80–90%; this directory has not independently verified that result.

Maintained by Peter Korpak, Founder & Chief AnalystHow evidence is checked

Evidence at a glance

Evidence status:
Automated evidence gate passed
Deployment timeframe:
Not reported by source
Reported outcome metrics:
3 cited below
Directory entry published:
Source link checked:

The source-link check confirms reachability, not independent re-verification of every claim.

80–90%Coding Automation Rate
~1 hourTime Per Encounter (Before)
4 months across all domestic locationsRollout Timeline

Source-reported figures — cited source: health.usnews.com

The Challenge

Cleveland Clinic's revenue cycle staff spent nearly an hour per patient encounter reviewing more than 100 clinical documents — including progress notes, discharge summaries, and pathology reports — to select accurate billing codes. The process was time-consuming, inefficient, and costly, and the health system could not hire enough staff to keep pace with the volume of encounters.

The Solution

Cleveland Clinic partnered with AKASA to deploy an AI documentation assistant and an AI coding assistant trained on years of internal multi-specialty data. The tools parse complex medical records, stitch together cohesive patient stories, and surface coding suggestions for human coders to review and approve or deny — augmenting rather than replacing the existing workforce.

Results

The tools were rolled out across all domestic Cleveland Clinic locations over four months and have since processed tens of thousands of patient encounters. The AI completes coding work automatically approximately 80–90% of the time with greater consistency than manual review. Cleveland Clinic subsequently expanded the partnership in October to target prior authorization, denials management, and incomplete documentation.

Key Takeaways

  • Training AI on years of system-specific, multi-specialty internal data is key to achieving high accuracy in a complex coding environment.
  • A human-in-the-loop model (AI suggests, humans approve) builds trust and maintains quality control while still capturing significant efficiency gains.
  • Success requires deliberate application alongside the technology — identifying the right problems is as important as the tool itself.

Share:

Details

Company Size
Enterprise
Evidence status
Automated evidence gate passed
Deployment timeframe
Not reported by source
Directory entry published
Source link checked

Cited source

health.usnews.com

Have a similar implementation?

Share your customer's AI results and link it to your vendor profile.

Submit a case study →