137-Bed LTACH achieves $3.2M in savings and 25% fall reduction with AvaSure virtual sitting program
“137-Bed LTACH achieves $3.2M in savings and 25% fall reduction with AvaSure virtual sitting program” documents a Patient Safety & Fall Prevention deployment in Hospital & Health System at 137-Bed Long-Term Acute Care Hospital (Anonymous Study Site). avasure.com reports total cost savings: $3.2M; this directory has not independently verified that result.
Evidence at a glance
- Evidence status:
- Automated evidence gate passed
- Deployment timeframe:
- Not reported by source
- Reported outcome metrics:
- 3 cited below
- Directory entry published:
- Source link checked:
The source-link check confirms reachability, not independent re-verification of every claim.
Source-reported figures — cited source: avasure.com
The Challenge
The hospital struggled to reduce inpatient falls while controlling high costs associated with one-to-one sitters. There was limited long-term peer-reviewed evidence demonstrating both quality and financial outcomes from virtual sitting programs specifically in LTACH settings. The organization needed to evaluate whether virtual monitoring could sustainably replace expensive 1:1 sitter staffing without compromising patient safety.
The Solution
The hospital deployed a continuous video monitoring (virtual sitting) program using AvaSure's platform across a 137-bed LTACH over a 40-month study period (20 months baseline, 20 months intervention). Virtual sitters were actively managed — assigned, reassigned, and discontinued based on patient need — avoiding passive monitoring. Sitter-to-patient ratios were optimized over time, increasing from 1:10 in the first 9 months to 1:12 in the final 11 months.
Results
The program achieved a statistically significant 25% reduction in patient falls (p=0.02) and a 90% reduction in 1:1 sitter hours (p<0.001). Total measurable financial impact reached $3.2M over the study period, comprising $160,234 in direct sitter cost savings and $3,041,390 in avoided fall-related costs. Notably, the higher 1:12 monitoring ratio delivered superior safety and financial outcomes compared to the earlier 1:10 ratio.
Key Takeaways
- Intentional, active management of virtual sitter assignments (not passive monitoring) is essential to achieving sustained fall reductions and cost savings.
- Higher sitter-to-patient ratios (1:12 vs 1:10) can deliver better outcomes, challenging the assumption that lower ratios are always safer or more effective.
- Virtual sitting in LTACH settings benefits from extended patient stays that allow virtual sitters to learn patient behaviors and enable more proactive monitoring strategies.
Explore Related
Details
- Industry
- Hospital & Health System
- Use Case
- Patient Safety & Fall Prevention
- AI Technology
- Computer Vision & Medical Imaging
- Company Size
- SME
- Company
- 137-Bed Long-Term Acute Care Hospital (Anonymous Study Site)
- Evidence status
- Automated evidence gate passed
- Deployment timeframe
- Not reported by source
- Directory entry published
- Source link checked
Cited source
avasure.comHave a similar implementation?
Share your customer's AI results and link it to your vendor profile.
Submit a case study →